|
People |
|---|
| Editorial Team |
| Reviewers |
| Contact |
| Submissions |
|---|
| Author Guidelines |
| Reviewer Guidelines |
| Copyright Notice |
| Privacy Statement |
| Manuscript Template |
| Information |
|---|
| For Readers |
| For Authors |
| For Reviewers |
| For Librarians |
| MITRA |
|---|
|
|
| Visitors |
|---|
|
|
For Reviewers
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the quality of a paper.
2. Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself from the review process.
3. Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to, or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
4. Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. The reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting rationale arguments.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify the source of references that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors or institutions connected to the papers.
7. PUBLISHER
It is committed to ensure that commercial interest has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. JURMAS (Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia) will assist in communications with other journals where this is useful to the authors. JESA is working closely with all related divisions to set standards for best practices on ethical matters, errors and retractions--and are prepared to provide specialized legal review and counsel if necessary
